HomeBy stateCalifornia → Culver City

133 attorneys in Culver City, California

Actively licensed attorneys with a business address in Culver City, taken from the California attorney registry and refreshed 2026-09-06.

133actively licensed
91%publish a phone number
11at the largest firm
55%in solo practice

More Culver City attorneys publish a phone number than the California average — 91% against 75%.

Culver City skews toward solo practice: 55% of its attorneys are solo, against 32% statewide.

Firm size mix in Culver City

Firm sizeAttorneysShare
Solo practice5855%
2–10 attorneys3634%
11–50 attorneys1110%
51+ attorneys00%

Firms with the most attorneys in Culver City

Firm or employerAttorneys
Sony Pictures Entertainment11
Amazon Studios6
Apple Inc4
Tiktok Inc3
Tiktok3
Sony Pictures3
Apple3
Sony Pictures Television2
Schonbrun Seplow Harris Hoffman & Zeldes LLP2
Ramo Law PC2

Sample rows

Phone numbers are masked here; the delivered file is not.

NameFirmPhone
Cyrus AfsharAmazon.Com, IncNot available
Nicole AhmedAmazon Studios(424) 532-2630
Carlos Alsina BatistaWajda & Associates888-213-0169
Helayne AntlerSony Pictures(310) 244-8275
Kristina AragonSony Pictures Entertainment(310) 244-5816
Jennifer BaltimoreJennifer Baltimore Law Office, PC(323) 917-9000

Questions about the Culver City list

Where does this data come from?

The California attorney registry, which the state publishes as a public record. We do not buy or merge third-party compiled lists.

Does every row have an email address?

No — and no honest attorney list has one for every row. The roster on this page carries no email column at all. Where we hold addresses they are sold separately, in our verified email list.

Where do the email addresses come from?

The California registry does not publish email addresses, so ours are read from firms' own websites and then matched back to a licensed attorney by name. Either way an address is only sold once it belongs to a named, currently-licensed attorney.

How current is it?

Last refreshed 2026-09-06 — that is the date of the scan behind these figures, not a promise of a schedule.