116 attorneys in Cupertino, California
Actively licensed attorneys with a business address in Cupertino, taken from the California attorney registry and refreshed 2026-09-06.
More Cupertino attorneys publish a phone number than the California average — 84% against 75%.
Cupertino skews toward larger firms: 12% of its attorneys are solo, against 32% statewide.
Firm size mix in Cupertino
| Firm size | Attorneys | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Solo practice | 11 | 12% |
| 2–10 attorneys | 33 | 35% |
| 11–50 attorneys | 50 | 53% |
| 51+ attorneys | 0 | 0% |
Firms with the most attorneys in Cupertino
| Firm or employer | Attorneys |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 37 |
| Apple | 13 |
| Apple Inc | 8 |
| Apple Inc | 7 |
| Apple, Inc | 6 |
| Junhe Law Office, P.C | 2 |
| Hackerrank | 2 |
| Grellas Shah LLP | 2 |
| Apple Inc. One Apple Park Way Ms | 2 |
| Apple Inc. One Apple Park Way | 2 |
Sample rows
Phone numbers are masked here; the delivered file is not.
| Name | Firm | Phone |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Andrade | Apple | (310) 648-2733 |
| Brian Ankenbrandt | Apple Inc | (669) 276-0730 |
| Johnny Arrowsmith | Junhe Law Office, P.C | |
| Sunil Bajaj | Apple Inc | (408) 974-2643 |
| Jonathan Beecher | Apple Inc | (408) 974-5020 |
| David Beeman | Apple Inc. One Apple Park Way Ms | (408) 974-5131 |
Questions about the Cupertino list
Where does this data come from?
The California attorney registry, which the state publishes as a public record. We do not buy or merge third-party compiled lists.
Does every row have an email address?
No — and no honest attorney list has one for every row. The roster on this page carries no email column at all. Where we hold addresses they are sold separately, in our verified email list.
Where do the email addresses come from?
The California registry does not publish email addresses, so ours are read from firms' own websites and then matched back to a licensed attorney by name. Either way an address is only sold once it belongs to a named, currently-licensed attorney.
How current is it?
Last refreshed 2026-09-06 — that is the date of the scan behind these figures, not a promise of a schedule.