253 attorneys in Longmont, Colorado
Actively licensed attorneys with a business address in Longmont, taken from the Colorado attorney registry and refreshed 2026-09-06.
Longmont skews toward solo practice: 62% of its attorneys are solo, against 43% statewide.
Firm size mix in Longmont
| Firm size | Attorneys | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Solo practice | 132 | 62% |
| 2–10 attorneys | 70 | 33% |
| 11–50 attorneys | 12 | 6% |
| 51+ attorneys | 0 | 0% |
Firms with the most attorneys in Longmont
| Firm or employer | Attorneys |
|---|---|
| Lyons Gaddis PC | 12 |
| Flanders Elsberg Herber Dunn LLC | 7 |
| Jorgensen, Brownell & Pepin, P.C | 5 |
| Lyons Gaddis, P.C | 4 |
| Lyons Gaddis P.C | 4 |
| The Bagley Law Firm | 3 |
| Lyons Gaddis, PC | 3 |
| Lyons Gaddis | 3 |
| Jorgensen Brownell Pepin P.C | 3 |
| City Of Longmont | 3 |
Sample rows
Phone numbers are masked here; the delivered file is not.
| Name | Firm | Phone |
|---|---|---|
| Brian Allard | Flanders, Elsberg, Herber & Dunn, LLC | (303) 776-5380 |
| Donald Alspaugh | Schey, Piller, Alspaugh & Wong, P.C | (303)776-3511 |
| Mildred Alvarez Grajeda | Mckinley Law Group | |
| Rachel Amspoker | Lyons Gaddis | (303) 766-9900 |
| Seann Archibald | Seagate Technology LLC | (703) 200-8702 |
| Matthew Athey | Jorgensen Brownell Pepin PC | 303-678-0560 |
Questions about the Longmont list
Where does this data come from?
The Colorado attorney registry, which the state publishes as a public record. We do not buy or merge third-party compiled lists.
Does every row have an email address?
No — and no honest attorney list has one for every row. The roster on this page carries no email column at all. Where we hold addresses they are sold separately, in our verified email list.
Where do the email addresses come from?
The Colorado bar publishes a member email address on its own record, so most of ours come straight from the registry rather than from a crawl. Either way an address is only sold once it belongs to a named, currently-licensed attorney.
How current is it?
Last refreshed 2026-09-06 — that is the date of the scan behind these figures, not a promise of a schedule.