HomeBy stateMassachusetts → Danvers

162 attorneys in Danvers, Massachusetts

Actively licensed attorneys with a business address in Danvers, taken from the Massachusetts attorney registry and refreshed 2026-09-06.

162actively licensed
79%publish a phone number
3at the largest firm
70%in solo practice

More Danvers attorneys publish a phone number than the Massachusetts average — 79% against 61%.

Danvers skews toward solo practice: 70% of its attorneys are solo, against 52% statewide.

Firm size mix in Danvers

Firm sizeAttorneysShare
Solo practice770%
2–10 attorneys330%
11–50 attorneys00%
51+ attorneys00%

Firms with the most attorneys in Danvers

Firm or employerAttorneys
Copyright Clearance Center3
Murphy & Riley, P.C1
Megaloudis & Gakis1
Law Offices Of Jonathan D. Messinger1
Johnson & Johnson1
Copyright Clearance Center, Inc1
Copyright Clearance Center Inc1
Aprodu Law, PLLC1

Sample rows

Phone numbers are masked here; the delivered file is not.

NameFirmPhone
Adela AproduAprodu Law, PLLC(978) 406-9890
Dominique BondiJohnson & Johnson(305) 606-3341
Monica ClohertyCopyright Clearance Center, Inc(781) 750-8400
Frank DepasqualeMurphy & Riley, P.C(617) 423-3700
Frederic HaberCopyright Clearance Center Inc(978) 750-8400
Gregory JacobsMegaloudis & Gakis305-432-0545

Questions about the Danvers list

Where does this data come from?

The Massachusetts attorney registry, which the state publishes as a public record. We do not buy or merge third-party compiled lists.

Does every row have an email address?

No — and no honest attorney list has one for every row. The roster on this page carries no email column at all. Where we hold addresses they are sold separately, in our verified email list.

Where do the email addresses come from?

The Massachusetts registry does not publish email addresses, so ours are read from firms' own websites and then matched back to a licensed attorney by name. Either way an address is only sold once it belongs to a named, currently-licensed attorney.

How current is it?

Last refreshed 2026-09-06 — that is the date of the scan behind these figures, not a promise of a schedule.