HomeBy stateTexas → Marshall

65 attorneys in Marshall, Texas

Actively licensed attorneys with a business address in Marshall, taken from the Texas attorney registry and refreshed 2026-09-06.

65actively licensed
92%publish a phone number
2at the largest firm
76%in solo practice

More Marshall attorneys publish a phone number than the Texas average — 92% against 72%.

Marshall skews toward solo practice: 76% of its attorneys are solo, against 44% statewide.

Firm size mix in Marshall

Firm sizeAttorneysShare
Solo practice3776%
2–10 attorneys1224%
11–50 attorneys00%
51+ attorneys00%

Firms with the most attorneys in Marshall

Firm or employerAttorneys
Mckool Smith2
Harrison County District Attorney'S Office2
Gillam & Smith LLP2
Carlile Law Firm2
Berry & Berry LLP2
Attorney At Law2
U. S. District Judge-Eastern District Of Texas1
Truelove Law Firm1
The Roth Law Firm1
The Carlile Law Firm1

Sample rows

Phone numbers are masked here; the delivered file is not.

NameFirmPhone
C. Bruce AbrahamSole Practitioner903-934-8844
Amanda AbrahamRoth & Abraham Law Firm, PC903-935-1665
Jim AmmermanLaw Office Of Jim Ammerman Ii903-938-2398
Daniel BaileyLaw Office Of Daniel Bailey, PLLC903-930-3199
Francis BaldwinBaldwin & Baldwin903-935-4131
John BaldwinBaldwin & Baldwin, LLP903-935-4131

Questions about the Marshall list

Where does this data come from?

The Texas attorney registry, which the state publishes as a public record. We do not buy or merge third-party compiled lists.

Does every row have an email address?

No — and no honest attorney list has one for every row. The roster on this page carries no email column at all. Where we hold addresses they are sold separately, in our verified email list.

Where do the email addresses come from?

The Texas registry does not publish email addresses, so ours are read from firms' own websites and then matched back to a licensed attorney by name. Either way an address is only sold once it belongs to a named, currently-licensed attorney.

How current is it?

Last refreshed 2026-09-06 — that is the date of the scan behind these figures, not a promise of a schedule.